DR LYDIA T WRIGHT SCH OF EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

184

46%

LEVEL 2

152

38%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

203

51%

LEVEL 2

130

33%

LEVEL 3

51

13%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

88

40%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

34

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

102

50%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

96

52%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

101

53%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

61
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

149

43%

LEVEL 2

135

39%

LEVEL 3

51

15%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

55
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

163

49%

LEVEL 2

114

34%

LEVEL 3

43

13%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

19

66%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

21

70%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

106

38%

LEVEL 2

118

42%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

120

42%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

78

65%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

83

73%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

64
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

180

46%

LEVEL 2

149

38%

LEVEL 3

53

13%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

63
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

192

50%

LEVEL 2

128

33%

LEVEL 3

51

13%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

11

79%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

17

36%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

167

47%

LEVEL 2

134

38%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

186

53%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

169

45%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

53

14%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

194

51%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

48

13%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

15

63%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.