LORRAINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

171

40%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

82

19%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

179

39%

LEVEL 2

139

30%

LEVEL 3

107

23%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

59

31%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

112

48%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

112

44%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

51

32%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

78

49%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

84

50%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

33

46%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

33

39%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

104

34%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

70

23%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

104

32%

LEVEL 3

88

27%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

67

59%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

12

11%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

77

57%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

114
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

163

40%

LEVEL 2

134

33%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

8

67%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

26

24%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

26

24%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

29

33%

LEVEL 3

26

30%

LEVEL 4

15

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

145

46%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

56

18%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

161

43%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

112
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

168

41%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

80

20%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

140
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

175

39%

LEVEL 2

137

30%

LEVEL 3

105

23%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.