Skip to Content
Main content

PS 64 FREDERICK LAW OLMSTED GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

102

43%

LEVEL 4

73

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

15%

LEVEL 3

107

47%

LEVEL 4

76

34%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

53

46%

LEVEL 4

37

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

19

16%

LEVEL 3

56

47%

LEVEL 4

42

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

49

40%

LEVEL 4

36

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

51

48%

LEVEL 4

34

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

8

62%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

88
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

13

13%

LEVEL 3

41

40%

LEVEL 4

47

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

44

41%

LEVEL 4

53

49%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

30

48%

LEVEL 4

15

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

35

64%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

23

46%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

18

45%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

89

46%

LEVEL 4

63

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

27

15%

LEVEL 3

86

48%

LEVEL 4

65

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

8

18%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

32
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

21

47%

LEVEL 4

11

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

175
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

102

44%

LEVEL 4

73

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

182
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

33

15%

LEVEL 3

106

48%

LEVEL 4

76

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

22

14%

LEVEL 3

70

46%

LEVEL 4

57

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

76

49%

LEVEL 4

63

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

32

37%

LEVEL 4

16

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

5

7%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

31

44%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.