BILINGUAL CENTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

187

63%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

19

6%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

36
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

214

70%

LEVEL 2

56

18%

LEVEL 3

29

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

89

56%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

101

66%

LEVEL 2

29

19%

LEVEL 3

15

10%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

98

71%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

113

73%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

22

50%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

17

71%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

12

63%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

145

65%

LEVEL 2

61

27%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

177

73%

LEVEL 2

37

15%

LEVEL 3

24

10%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

134

59%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

150

64%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

53

78%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

64

89%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

27
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

72

47%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

65

49%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

115

80%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

149

86%

LEVEL 2

19

11%

LEVEL 3

6

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

8

30%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

179

66%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

13

5%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

208

72%

LEVEL 2

51

18%

LEVEL 3

25

9%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

178

63%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.