Skip to Content
Main content

MARVA J DANIEL FUTURES PREP SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

130

59%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

144

57%

LEVEL 2

61

24%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

59

50%

LEVEL 2

46

39%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

63

52%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

71

70%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

19
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

81

62%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

10

50%

LEVEL 2

10

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

95

60%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

15

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

104

59%

LEVEL 2

47

27%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

18

75%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

79

49%

LEVEL 2

63

39%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

89

49%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

51

85%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

55

77%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

118

57%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

125

55%

LEVEL 2

59

26%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

12

92%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

19

79%

LEVEL 2

2

8%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

126

59%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

138

57%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

19
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

118

59%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

19

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

137

58%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

30

13%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.