D'YOUVILLE-PORTER CAMPUS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

214

59%

LEVEL 2

98

27%

LEVEL 3

47

13%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

233

62%

LEVEL 2

83

22%

LEVEL 3

48

13%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

90

50%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

102

55%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

124

68%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

131

69%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

25

48%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

25

56%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

172

64%

LEVEL 2

65

24%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

197

67%

LEVEL 2

60

20%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

157

53%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

56
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

175

57%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

47

15%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

57

86%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

58

87%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

92

42%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

87

41%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

122

85%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

146

90%

LEVEL 2

15

9%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

196

60%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

223

64%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

48
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

202

59%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

4

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

55
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

226

63%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.