Skip to Content
Main content

FOREST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

86

46%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

70

42%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

37

42%

LEVEL 4

32

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

57
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

34

42%

LEVEL 4

23

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

49

49%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

22

26%

LEVEL 3

36

43%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

10

59%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

61

43%

LEVEL 4

36

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

49

43%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

83

49%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

69

47%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

10

56%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

101
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

67

43%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

76

50%

LEVEL 4

40

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

56

47%

LEVEL 4

31

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

18

50%

LEVEL 3

10

28%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

14

31%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.