Skip to Content
Main content

HEIM MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

78

19%

LEVEL 2

117

28%

LEVEL 3

101

24%

LEVEL 4

120

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

90

20%

LEVEL 2

124

28%

LEVEL 3

131

29%

LEVEL 4

105

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

46

26%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

62

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

45

21%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

59

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

54

22%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

59

24%

LEVEL 4

58

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

54

23%

LEVEL 2

79

33%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

12

55%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

45
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

25

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

16

24%

LEVEL 4

23

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

154
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

82

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

99

30%

LEVEL 3

98

30%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

7

41%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

110

28%

LEVEL 3

101

26%

LEVEL 4

119

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

116

28%

LEVEL 3

130

31%

LEVEL 4

104

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

20

71%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

26

72%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

221
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

115

29%

LEVEL 3

101

25%

LEVEL 4

120

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

236
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

75

17%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

131

30%

LEVEL 4

105

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

13

87%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

15

79%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

109

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

215
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

103

27%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

93

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

21

34%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

23

35%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.