AMHERST MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

65

14%

LEVEL 2

118

26%

LEVEL 3

134

29%

LEVEL 4

139

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

76

17%

LEVEL 2

130

28%

LEVEL 3

122

27%

LEVEL 4

132

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

89

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

68

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

50

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

51

21%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

64

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

5

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

21
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

15

48%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

12

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

113

33%

LEVEL 4

108

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

204
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

92

27%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

107

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

20

41%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

19

39%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

105

25%

LEVEL 3

129

31%

LEVEL 4

138

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

122

29%

LEVEL 3

120

28%

LEVEL 4

131

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

27

71%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

268
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

61

14%

LEVEL 2

110

25%

LEVEL 3

130

30%

LEVEL 4

138

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

249
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

67

15%

LEVEL 2

128

29%

LEVEL 3

120

27%

LEVEL 4

129

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

71

22%

LEVEL 3

112

34%

LEVEL 4

110

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

80

25%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

104

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

31

24%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

29

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.