MILLBROOK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

100

34%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

57

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

100

34%

LEVEL 4

55

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

40

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

35

25%

LEVEL 3

57

41%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

43

28%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

78

36%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

10

22%

LEVEL 2

22

49%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

10

19%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

17

32%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

54

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

95

37%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

19

48%

LEVEL 2

18

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

140
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

97

34%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

153
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

30

14%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

68

31%

LEVEL 4

49

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

75

36%

LEVEL 4

52

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

23

30%

LEVEL 2

31

40%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

20

25%

LEVEL 2

32

40%

LEVEL 3

25

31%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.