VAN WYCK JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

79

17%

LEVEL 2

155

34%

LEVEL 3

147

32%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

141

25%

LEVEL 2

197

35%

LEVEL 3

127

22%

LEVEL 4

102

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

82

37%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

133
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

88

32%

LEVEL 3

77

28%

LEVEL 4

56

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

85

29%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

50

17%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

14

38%

LEVEL 4

15

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

7

28%

LEVEL 4

9

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

118

37%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

156
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

99

24%

LEVEL 2

156

38%

LEVEL 3

83

20%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

13

33%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

12

30%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

24

38%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

24

29%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

138

33%

LEVEL 3

146

35%

LEVEL 4

76

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

101

20%

LEVEL 2

177

35%

LEVEL 3

122

24%

LEVEL 4

102

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

26

59%

LEVEL 2

17

39%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

40

62%

LEVEL 2

20

31%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

126

32%

LEVEL 3

133

34%

LEVEL 4

72

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

199
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

103

22%

LEVEL 2

170

36%

LEVEL 3

112

24%

LEVEL 4

87

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

29

47%

LEVEL 3

14

23%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

38

40%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.