WAPPINGERS JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

112

25%

LEVEL 2

150

33%

LEVEL 3

128

28%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

124

25%

LEVEL 2

178

36%

LEVEL 3

119

24%

LEVEL 4

68

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

79

31%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

84

33%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

15

43%

LEVEL 4

11

31%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

14

42%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

122
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

81

31%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

111
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

18

42%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

37

34%

LEVEL 2

43

39%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

25

19%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

125

32%

LEVEL 4

61

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

160

38%

LEVEL 3

116

28%

LEVEL 4

66

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

35

63%

LEVEL 2

17

30%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

48

68%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

87

28%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

54

35%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

70

40%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

188
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

107

24%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

61

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

186
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

120

25%

LEVEL 2

172

36%

LEVEL 3

119

25%

LEVEL 4

67

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.