BRINCKERHOFF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

53

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

62

23%

LEVEL 3

101

38%

LEVEL 4

64

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

47

41%

LEVEL 4

30

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

55

39%

LEVEL 4

39

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

30

24%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

23

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

46

37%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

11

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

15

63%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

38

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

72

39%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

6

55%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

16

44%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

57

25%

LEVEL 3

83

37%

LEVEL 4

53

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

98

40%

LEVEL 4

64

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

12

80%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

52

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

89

39%

LEVEL 4

62

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

15

35%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

11

31%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.