Skip to Content
Main content

MILL ROAD-INTERMEDIATE GRADES GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

119

40%

LEVEL 4

65

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

133

40%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

107
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

63

39%

LEVEL 4

44

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

75

45%

LEVEL 4

39

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

21

15%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

56

40%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

83%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

162
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

104

40%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

77

27%

LEVEL 3

112

39%

LEVEL 4

54

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

114

43%

LEVEL 4

65

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

124

43%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

17

52%

LEVEL 2

11

33%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

16

36%

LEVEL 2

19

42%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

183
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

30

10%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

118

40%

LEVEL 4

65

22%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

190
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

43

13%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

131

41%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

93

42%

LEVEL 4

54

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

98

42%

LEVEL 4

47

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

19

23%

LEVEL 2

26

32%

LEVEL 3

26

32%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

35

36%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.