RHINEBECK CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

126

32%

LEVEL 3

151

38%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

78

19%

LEVEL 2

129

31%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

76

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

85

42%

LEVEL 4

36

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

76

35%

LEVEL 4

49

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

43

22%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

66

34%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

62

31%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

180
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

103

31%

LEVEL 3

128

39%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

59

17%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

117

34%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

11

29%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

11

26%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

112

31%

LEVEL 3

144

40%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

136

37%

LEVEL 4

75

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

24

49%

LEVEL 2

22

45%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

206
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

61

16%

LEVEL 2

121

31%

LEVEL 3

150

39%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

214
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

73

18%

LEVEL 2

126

31%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

76

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

127

41%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

113

35%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

23

26%

LEVEL 2

34

38%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

42

41%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.