Skip to Content
Main content

ORVILLE A TODD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

58

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

77

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

31

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

36

27%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

27

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

43

29%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

15

42%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

16

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

49

40%

LEVEL 4

32

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

49

36%

LEVEL 4

43

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

12

34%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

20

40%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

23

48%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

10

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

83

36%

LEVEL 4

57

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

76

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

19

68%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

51

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

64

31%

LEVEL 4

70

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

17

25%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

26

35%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.