G W KRIEGER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

121

42%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

51

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

132

44%

LEVEL 2

110

37%

LEVEL 3

47

16%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

51

35%

LEVEL 2

56

39%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

57

40%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

70

48%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

75

48%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

12

38%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

58

46%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

56

47%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

21

18%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

44

39%

LEVEL 2

52

46%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

53

43%

LEVEL 2

50

41%

LEVEL 3

17

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

106

45%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

93

36%

LEVEL 2

105

41%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

49

91%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

39

87%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

58
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

98

41%

LEVEL 2

83

35%

LEVEL 3

49

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

53
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

102

42%

LEVEL 2

89

36%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

23

45%

LEVEL 2

26

51%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

30

54%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

13

29%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

31

38%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

108

44%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

101

46%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

108

40%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

120

43%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

47

17%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.