PAWLING MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

70

32%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

35

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

38

33%

LEVEL 4

37

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

44

40%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

50

29%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

47

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

50

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

21

43%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

13

26%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

19

38%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

67

35%

LEVEL 4

55

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

110
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

126
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

56

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

43

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

43

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

30

42%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.