Skip to Content
Main content

WARRING MAGNET ACAD OF SCI & TECH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

74

39%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

54

26%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

31

36%

LEVEL 2

27

32%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

25

26%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

30

31%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

43

41%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

39

36%

LEVEL 2

43

40%

LEVEL 3

24

22%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

35

42%

LEVEL 2

27

33%

LEVEL 3

17

20%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

30

29%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

28

34%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

30

35%

LEVEL 2

32

37%

LEVEL 3

20

23%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

49

33%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

24

62%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

48
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

59

37%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

66

37%

LEVEL 3

54

30%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

65

40%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

54

33%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

63
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

61

31%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

65

37%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

69

38%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

9

56%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.