PAWLING CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

58

16%

LEVEL 2

111

31%

LEVEL 3

135

37%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

211
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

21

12%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

74

41%

LEVEL 4

42

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

53

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

37

20%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

157
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

67

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

16

21%

LEVEL 2

36

46%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

27

27%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

35

35%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

93

29%

LEVEL 3

133

42%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

127

37%

LEVEL 4

78

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

25

56%

LEVEL 2

18

40%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

17

40%

LEVEL 2

20

47%

LEVEL 3

5

12%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

193
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

98

29%

LEVEL 3

134

39%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

211
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

132

37%

LEVEL 4

79

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

13

62%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

17

61%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

99

40%

LEVEL 4

54

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

61

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

50

43%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

53

35%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

209
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

120

31%

LEVEL 3

131

34%

LEVEL 4

78

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.