Skip to Content
Main content

HAVILAND MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

149

34%

LEVEL 2

138

32%

LEVEL 3

104

24%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

208

39%

LEVEL 2

153

29%

LEVEL 3

107

20%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

65

31%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

89

40%

LEVEL 2

83

37%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

123

44%

LEVEL 2

76

27%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

9

36%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

69

28%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

73

30%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

108
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

106

36%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

37

58%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

38

57%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

33

38%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

50

41%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

91

25%

LEVEL 2

123

34%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

130

30%

LEVEL 2

137

31%

LEVEL 3

105

24%

LEVEL 4

65

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

58

76%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

78

81%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

172
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

191

37%

LEVEL 2

152

30%

LEVEL 3

107

21%

LEVEL 4

65

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

17

94%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

49

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

109

47%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

38

16%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

150

50%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

148
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

144

34%

LEVEL 2

135

32%

LEVEL 3

103

24%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

172
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

203

39%

LEVEL 2

152

29%

LEVEL 3

107

20%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.