DOVER UFSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

128

27%

LEVEL 2

176

37%

LEVEL 3

136

28%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

173

32%

LEVEL 2

173

32%

LEVEL 3

129

24%

LEVEL 4

72

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

60

25%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

81

34%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

64

23%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

68

28%

LEVEL 2

101

42%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

109

40%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

6

24%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

8

57%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

69

24%

LEVEL 2

108

37%

LEVEL 3

84

29%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

135
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

94

28%

LEVEL 2

109

32%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

47

33%

LEVEL 2

56

40%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

59

37%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

34

22%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

91

22%

LEVEL 2

154

37%

LEVEL 3

135

32%

LEVEL 4

39

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

116

25%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

123

26%

LEVEL 4

71

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

37

61%

LEVEL 2

22

36%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

57

70%

LEVEL 2

17

21%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

172
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

109

24%

LEVEL 2

165

37%

LEVEL 3

132

30%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

200
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

151

29%

LEVEL 2

163

32%

LEVEL 3

128

25%

LEVEL 4

72

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

19

56%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

22

67%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

69

36%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

64

29%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

102

35%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

67

23%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

132

40%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.