Skip to Content
Main content

SIDNEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

84

27%

LEVEL 2

108

35%

LEVEL 3

73

24%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

104

31%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

85

25%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

30

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

67

40%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

89

33%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

102
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

88

31%

LEVEL 2

90

32%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

12

44%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

103

34%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

14

44%

LEVEL 2

13

41%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

31

21%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

53

33%

LEVEL 2

63

39%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

75

42%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

113
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

84

28%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

120
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

84

26%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.