HOMER INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

110

29%

LEVEL 2

120

32%

LEVEL 3

111

29%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

118

30%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

45

22%

LEVEL 2

61

30%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

65

37%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

59
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

70

37%

LEVEL 2

60

32%

LEVEL 3

44

23%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

95

27%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

136
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

106

29%

LEVEL 2

120

33%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

75

22%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

38

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

110

32%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

35

85%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

34

76%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

147
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

107

29%

LEVEL 2

120

32%

LEVEL 3

109

29%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

76

39%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

76

38%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

76

42%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

78

40%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

36

19%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

148
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

106

28%

LEVEL 2

119

32%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

38

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.