Skip to Content
Main content

CORTLAND CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 930

LEVEL 1

335

36%

LEVEL 2

343

37%

LEVEL 3

191

21%

LEVEL 4

61

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 897

LEVEL 1

335

37%

LEVEL 2

329

37%

LEVEL 3

176

20%

LEVEL 4

57

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

135

30%

LEVEL 2

166

36%

LEVEL 3

118

26%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

125

29%

LEVEL 2

163

38%

LEVEL 3

102

24%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 474

LEVEL 1

200

42%

LEVEL 2

177

37%

LEVEL 3

73

15%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

210

45%

LEVEL 2

166

35%

LEVEL 3

74

16%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

29

48%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

222
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 794

LEVEL 1

273

34%

LEVEL 2

299

38%

LEVEL 3

166

21%

LEVEL 4

56

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 762

LEVEL 1

278

36%

LEVEL 2

278

36%

LEVEL 3

152

20%

LEVEL 4

54

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

18

43%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 822

LEVEL 1

248

30%

LEVEL 2

329

40%

LEVEL 3

185

23%

LEVEL 4

60

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 783

LEVEL 1

244

31%

LEVEL 2

313

40%

LEVEL 3

169

22%

LEVEL 4

57

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

87

81%

LEVEL 2

14

13%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

91

80%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

69

19%

LEVEL 2

144

40%

LEVEL 3

105

29%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

70

22%

LEVEL 2

129

40%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

266

47%

LEVEL 2

199

35%

LEVEL 3

86

15%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

265

46%

LEVEL 2

200

35%

LEVEL 3

90

16%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

251
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 924

LEVEL 1

332

36%

LEVEL 2

341

37%

LEVEL 3

190

21%

LEVEL 4

61

7%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

233
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 889

LEVEL 1

330

37%

LEVEL 2

326

37%

LEVEL 3

176

20%

LEVEL 4

57

6%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

232
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 881

LEVEL 1

323

37%

LEVEL 2

326

37%

LEVEL 3

175

20%

LEVEL 4

57

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.