Skip to Content
Main content

TACONIC HILLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

116

32%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

122

35%

LEVEL 3

82

24%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

53

30%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

58

32%

LEVEL 3

50

27%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

56

32%

LEVEL 2

60

35%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

10

45%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

10

42%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

87

31%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

94

35%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

9

23%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

83

26%

LEVEL 2

121

38%

LEVEL 3

84

26%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

85

27%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

33

80%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

22

73%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

112

32%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

40

33%

LEVEL 4

18

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

24

21%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

39

35%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

96

40%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

83

36%

LEVEL 2

94

40%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

114
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

115

33%

LEVEL 2

122

35%

LEVEL 3

83

24%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

112
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

106

31%

LEVEL 2

119

35%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

114
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

107

32%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

80

24%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.