PERU CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

209
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

141

25%

LEVEL 2

209

37%

LEVEL 3

159

28%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 648

LEVEL 1

211

33%

LEVEL 2

216

33%

LEVEL 3

157

24%

LEVEL 4

64

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

90

32%

LEVEL 4

32

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

87

27%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

91

28%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

83

30%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

124

38%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

131

25%

LEVEL 2

192

37%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

48

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

208
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

195

32%

LEVEL 2

199

33%

LEVEL 3

147

24%

LEVEL 4

61

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

80%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

80

18%

LEVEL 2

170

37%

LEVEL 3

154

34%

LEVEL 4

50

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

124

24%

LEVEL 2

179

34%

LEVEL 3

155

30%

LEVEL 4

64

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

61

58%

LEVEL 2

39

37%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

87

69%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

115

38%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

68

21%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

106

33%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

102

39%

LEVEL 2

100

38%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

143

44%

LEVEL 2

110

34%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

208
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

135

25%

LEVEL 2

208

38%

LEVEL 3

158

29%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

221
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 642

LEVEL 1

209

33%

LEVEL 2

212

33%

LEVEL 3

157

24%

LEVEL 4

64

10%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

208
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 552

LEVEL 1

136

25%

LEVEL 2

208

38%

LEVEL 3

158

29%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

221
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

209

33%

LEVEL 2

213

33%

LEVEL 3

157

24%

LEVEL 4

64

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.