AUSABLE VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

57

24%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

108

22%

LEVEL 2

187

39%

LEVEL 3

127

26%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

103

39%

LEVEL 3

70

26%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

29

25%

LEVEL 2

52

45%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

57

26%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

96
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

55

23%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

181
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

104

22%

LEVEL 2

179

39%

LEVEL 3

119

26%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

78

39%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

67

16%

LEVEL 2

154

38%

LEVEL 3

123

30%

LEVEL 4

63

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

23

58%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

41

53%

LEVEL 2

33

42%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

20

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

54

39%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

70

25%

LEVEL 2

116

42%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

189
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

106

22%

LEVEL 2

185

39%

LEVEL 3

127

26%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

95
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

55

23%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

70

30%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

188
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

106

22%

LEVEL 2

183

38%

LEVEL 3

125

26%

LEVEL 4

63

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.