HENDY AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

184

40%

LEVEL 2

148

32%

LEVEL 3

95

20%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

200

47%

LEVEL 2

123

29%

LEVEL 3

74

17%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

69

33%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

94

44%

LEVEL 2

55

26%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

115

45%

LEVEL 2

80

31%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

106

49%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

31

46%

LEVEL 2

18

27%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

19
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

32

49%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

112

35%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

67

21%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

115

43%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

31

53%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

43

59%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

135

34%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

153

41%

LEVEL 2

112

30%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

49

71%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

47

78%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

54

40%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

40

30%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

164

50%

LEVEL 2

109

33%

LEVEL 3

41

13%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

173

59%

LEVEL 2

77

26%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

132
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

182

40%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

95

21%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.