FREDONIA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

112

26%

LEVEL 2

145

34%

LEVEL 3

119

28%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

188
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

118

26%

LEVEL 2

142

32%

LEVEL 3

139

31%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

70

34%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

51

22%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

81

36%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

73

21%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

124

35%

LEVEL 4

42

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

26

45%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

37

54%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

73

19%

LEVEL 2

136

36%

LEVEL 3

117

31%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

125

32%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

49

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

39

78%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

42

69%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

174
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

106

25%

LEVEL 2

144

34%

LEVEL 3

119

28%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

188
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

108

25%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

139

32%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

10

91%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

93

35%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

106

40%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

70

42%

LEVEL 2

52

31%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

84

45%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.