GEORGE WASHINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

235

50%

LEVEL 2

124

26%

LEVEL 3

67

14%

LEVEL 4

43

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

225

49%

LEVEL 2

124

27%

LEVEL 3

65

14%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

94

42%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

97

45%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

32

15%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

141

58%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

29

12%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

128

52%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

33

13%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

28

47%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

24

43%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

96

39%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

35

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

91

40%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

99

70%

LEVEL 2

25

18%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

102

64%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

178

44%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

65

16%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

162

42%

LEVEL 2

117

30%

LEVEL 3

65

17%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

57

85%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

63

90%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

111
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

193

45%

LEVEL 2

123

29%

LEVEL 3

65

15%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

32

97%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

25

21%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

18

18%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

29

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

209

59%

LEVEL 2

86

24%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

207

58%

LEVEL 2

95

26%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

220

48%

LEVEL 2

123

27%

LEVEL 3

65

14%

LEVEL 4

46

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.