Skip to Content
Main content

PERSELL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

155

34%

LEVEL 2

138

31%

LEVEL 3

86

19%

LEVEL 4

71

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

213

43%

LEVEL 2

138

28%

LEVEL 3

77

16%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

62

28%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

50

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

81

34%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

48

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

95

41%

LEVEL 2

76

33%

LEVEL 3

40

17%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

132

52%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

17

36%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

14

30%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

28

48%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

112

34%

LEVEL 2

93

28%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

130

38%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

55

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

22

37%

LEVEL 2

26

43%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

47

59%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

114

29%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

85

21%

LEVEL 4

71

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

137

33%

LEVEL 2

133

33%

LEVEL 3

77

19%

LEVEL 4

62

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

41

79%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

76

94%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

45

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

37

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

134

44%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

175

51%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

49

14%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

139
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

208

43%

LEVEL 2

136

28%

LEVEL 3

77

16%

LEVEL 4

62

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.