DUNKIRK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

162

40%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

90

22%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

169

43%

LEVEL 2

136

34%

LEVEL 3

56

14%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

59

31%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

66

35%

LEVEL 2

77

41%

LEVEL 3

33

17%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

103

47%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

103

50%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

12

52%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

53

33%

LEVEL 3

57

35%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

36

23%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

110

52%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

109

55%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

114
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

141

37%

LEVEL 2

123

33%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

143

40%

LEVEL 2

129

36%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

21

68%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

26

76%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

115
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

106

31%

LEVEL 2

118

35%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

90
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

125

37%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

56

16%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

56

80%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

44

81%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

33

26%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

29

27%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

17

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

129

46%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

52

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

140

48%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

26

9%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

115
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

156

39%

LEVEL 2

130

32%

LEVEL 3

90

22%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

114
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

153

39%

LEVEL 2

128

32%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

26

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

160

42%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

9

64%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

9

90%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.