PORT BYRON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

120

45%

LEVEL 2

83

31%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

116

35%

LEVEL 2

124

38%

LEVEL 3

56

17%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

44

35%

LEVEL 2

46

37%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

57

34%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

76

54%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

24

17%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

59

37%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

110

45%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

101

34%

LEVEL 2

116

39%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

89

40%

LEVEL 2

73

33%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

75

27%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

56

20%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

31

72%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

41

77%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

39

31%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

35

22%

LEVEL 2

62

40%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

81

57%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

81

47%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

63
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

115

44%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.