AUBURN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

148

45%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

158

47%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

50

32%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

41

26%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

59

39%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

98

57%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

39
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

99

54%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

33

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

17

68%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

83%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

107

41%

LEVEL 2

89

34%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

118

45%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

55

21%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

110

39%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

125

43%

LEVEL 2

82

28%

LEVEL 3

63

22%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

33

73%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

39

28%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

44

31%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

108

61%

LEVEL 2

50

28%

LEVEL 3

16

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

119

62%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

70
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

140

44%

LEVEL 2

105

33%

LEVEL 3

61

19%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.