PORTVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

80

17%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

141

31%

LEVEL 4

96

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

72

16%

LEVEL 2

133

30%

LEVEL 3

145

33%

LEVEL 4

96

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

69

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

84

37%

LEVEL 4

61

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

65

28%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

45

21%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

76

18%

LEVEL 2

133

31%

LEVEL 3

130

30%

LEVEL 4

93

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

67

16%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

139

33%

LEVEL 4

90

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

132

32%

LEVEL 3

137

33%

LEVEL 4

95

23%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

120

30%

LEVEL 3

141

35%

LEVEL 4

96

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

31

69%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

23

58%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

66

29%

LEVEL 3

73

32%

LEVEL 4

62

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

28

12%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

86

38%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

231
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 452

LEVEL 1

80

18%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

136

30%

LEVEL 4

95

21%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

83%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.