Skip to Content
Main content

CATTARAUGUS-LITTLE VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

85

26%

LEVEL 2

108

33%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

95

28%

LEVEL 2

123

36%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

31

20%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

56

33%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

61

34%

LEVEL 3

43

24%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

79

26%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

36

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

85

26%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

90

33%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

31

56%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

37

79%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

44

31%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

46

33%

LEVEL 3

48

35%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

59

33%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

120
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

94

28%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.