WHITNEY POINT CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

156

28%

LEVEL 2

183

33%

LEVEL 3

144

26%

LEVEL 4

70

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

158

26%

LEVEL 2

219

36%

LEVEL 3

155

26%

LEVEL 4

74

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

139
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

65

20%

LEVEL 2

115

36%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

93

32%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

206
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

149

28%

LEVEL 2

178

33%

LEVEL 3

138

26%

LEVEL 4

68

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

155

26%

LEVEL 2

212

36%

LEVEL 3

147

25%

LEVEL 4

74

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

93

20%

LEVEL 2

157

34%

LEVEL 3

142

31%

LEVEL 4

70

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

224
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

83

17%

LEVEL 2

191

38%

LEVEL 3

150

30%

LEVEL 4

74

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

63

69%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

75

69%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

57

27%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

36

16%

LEVEL 2

65

29%

LEVEL 3

79

35%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

123

36%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

69

20%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

122

32%

LEVEL 2

154

40%

LEVEL 3

76

20%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

207
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

150

28%

LEVEL 2

178

33%

LEVEL 3

138

26%

LEVEL 4

69

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

219
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

150

26%

LEVEL 2

207

36%

LEVEL 3

148

26%

LEVEL 4

71

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.