CHENANGO VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

158

23%

LEVEL 2

243

36%

LEVEL 3

195

29%

LEVEL 4

79

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

166

25%

LEVEL 2

211

31%

LEVEL 3

195

29%

LEVEL 4

99

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

72

23%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

96

26%

LEVEL 2

147

40%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

94

27%

LEVEL 2

120

34%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

12

36%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

16

40%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

250
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

132

22%

LEVEL 2

220

37%

LEVEL 3

174

29%

LEVEL 4

76

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

270
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

134

23%

LEVEL 2

183

31%

LEVEL 3

181

31%

LEVEL 4

89

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

94

17%

LEVEL 2

204

36%

LEVEL 3

185

33%

LEVEL 4

77

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 568

LEVEL 1

104

18%

LEVEL 2

178

31%

LEVEL 3

188

33%

LEVEL 4

98

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

64

56%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

62

60%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

274
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 665

LEVEL 1

149

22%

LEVEL 2

242

36%

LEVEL 3

195

29%

LEVEL 4

79

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

9

90%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

192
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

41

11%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

124

34%

LEVEL 4

68

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

198
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

60

16%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

119

32%

LEVEL 4

79

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

117

38%

LEVEL 2

111

36%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

106

36%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

274
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 670

LEVEL 1

155

23%

LEVEL 2

241

36%

LEVEL 3

195

29%

LEVEL 4

79

12%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

274
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 669

LEVEL 1

156

23%

LEVEL 2

239

36%

LEVEL 3

195

29%

LEVEL 4

79

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.