SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

122

21%

LEVEL 2

202

36%

LEVEL 3

178

31%

LEVEL 4

67

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

120

20%

LEVEL 2

192

32%

LEVEL 3

189

32%

LEVEL 4

93

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

99

37%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

81

27%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

71

23%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

4

19%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

4

18%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

105

20%

LEVEL 2

182

35%

LEVEL 3

166

32%

LEVEL 4

60

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

259
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

106

20%

LEVEL 2

176

33%

LEVEL 3

172

32%

LEVEL 4

87

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

9

53%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

95

19%

LEVEL 2

176

35%

LEVEL 3

170

34%

LEVEL 4

66

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

96

18%

LEVEL 2

171

32%

LEVEL 3

182

34%

LEVEL 4

89

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

26

42%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

24

43%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

167
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

109

35%

LEVEL 3

114

37%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

87

27%

LEVEL 3

117

37%

LEVEL 4

68

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

86

33%

LEVEL 2

93

36%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

75

27%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

244
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

117

21%

LEVEL 2

199

36%

LEVEL 3

177

32%

LEVEL 4

67

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

281
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 584

LEVEL 1

115

20%

LEVEL 2

188

32%

LEVEL 3

188

32%

LEVEL 4

93

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.