Skip to Content
Main content

SHAKER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

486
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 784

LEVEL 1

91

12%

LEVEL 2

207

26%

LEVEL 3

268

34%

LEVEL 4

218

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

491
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 737

LEVEL 1

84

11%

LEVEL 2

162

22%

LEVEL 3

258

35%

LEVEL 4

233

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

239
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

31

9%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

118

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

248
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

65

19%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

128

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

247
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

60

14%

LEVEL 2

119

28%

LEVEL 3

147

35%

LEVEL 4

100

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

243
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

97

24%

LEVEL 3

138

35%

LEVEL 4

105

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

29
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

7

16%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

16

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

117
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

16

11%

LEVEL 3

53

37%

LEVEL 4

64

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

134
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

26

16%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

78

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

312
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

63

12%

LEVEL 2

149

28%

LEVEL 3

177

34%

LEVEL 4

135

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

289
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

53

12%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

168

38%

LEVEL 4

121

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

17

39%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

478
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 684

LEVEL 1

39

6%

LEVEL 2

167

24%

LEVEL 3

260

38%

LEVEL 4

218

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

476
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

44

7%

LEVEL 2

132

20%

LEVEL 3

245

38%

LEVEL 4

231

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

52

52%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

40

47%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

486
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 772

LEVEL 1

85

11%

LEVEL 2

201

26%

LEVEL 3

268

35%

LEVEL 4

218

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

488
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

73

10%

LEVEL 2

153

21%

LEVEL 3

255

36%

LEVEL 4

233

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

419
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 603

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

144

24%

LEVEL 3

219

36%

LEVEL 4

200

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

408
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

39

7%

LEVEL 2

117

21%

LEVEL 3

207

37%

LEVEL 4

201

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

51

28%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

45

26%

LEVEL 2

45

26%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

479
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 770

LEVEL 1

89

12%

LEVEL 2

202

26%

LEVEL 3

262

34%

LEVEL 4

217

28%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.