LISHA KILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

124

23%

LEVEL 2

190

35%

LEVEL 3

146

27%

LEVEL 4

87

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

121

23%

LEVEL 2

163

31%

LEVEL 3

132

25%

LEVEL 4

106

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

47

18%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

74

27%

LEVEL 2

108

39%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

88

33%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

10

28%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

11

26%

LEVEL 4

11

26%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

24

41%

LEVEL 4

17

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

43
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

25

40%

LEVEL 4

18

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

80

21%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

53

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

79

23%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

72

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

12

30%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

16

39%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

6

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

68

14%

LEVEL 2

173

37%

LEVEL 3

144

31%

LEVEL 4

86

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

67

15%

LEVEL 2

156

34%

LEVEL 3

128

28%

LEVEL 4

105

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

56

74%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

54

82%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

138

35%

LEVEL 3

113

29%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

69

19%

LEVEL 2

115

31%

LEVEL 3

96

26%

LEVEL 4

89

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

52

33%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

20

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

52

34%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

232
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

121

22%

LEVEL 2

187

35%

LEVEL 3

145

27%

LEVEL 4

87

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

237
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

118

23%

LEVEL 2

160

31%

LEVEL 3

132

26%

LEVEL 4

105

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.