GLENMONT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

75

43%

LEVEL 4

50

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

86

48%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

12

14%

LEVEL 3

35

42%

LEVEL 4

32

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

42

51%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

26

29%

LEVEL 3

40

45%

LEVEL 4

18

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

44

46%

LEVEL 4

14

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

9

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

101
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

64

45%

LEVEL 4

37

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

75

50%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

67

46%

LEVEL 4

48

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

73

51%

LEVEL 4

30

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

13

36%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

124
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

74

44%

LEVEL 4

50

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

115
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

41

24%

LEVEL 3

85

49%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

8

5%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

65

45%

LEVEL 4

42

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

75

51%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

8

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

11

33%

LEVEL 4

6

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.