WILLIAM S HACKETT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

209

41%

LEVEL 2

133

26%

LEVEL 3

97

19%

LEVEL 4

70

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

239

46%

LEVEL 2

123

24%

LEVEL 3

98

19%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

86

35%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

86

37%

LEVEL 2

63

27%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

31

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

123

47%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

40

15%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

153

54%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

24

36%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

13

20%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

31
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

25

34%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

23

20%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

36

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

33

26%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

27

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

103

48%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

99

53%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

49

55%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

18

20%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

67

68%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

153

35%

LEVEL 2

127

29%

LEVEL 3

95

21%

LEVEL 4

68

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

175

41%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

96

22%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

56

85%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

64

77%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

162
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

159

36%

LEVEL 2

118

27%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

69

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

152
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

186

42%

LEVEL 2

110

25%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

50

71%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

53

79%

LEVEL 2

13

19%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

39

22%

LEVEL 3

53

30%

LEVEL 4

47

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

171

52%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

44

13%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

203

62%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

41

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

164
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

199

41%

LEVEL 2

128

26%

LEVEL 3

95

19%

LEVEL 4

69

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

151
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

228

46%

LEVEL 2

120

24%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.