GENESEO CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

87

26%

LEVEL 2

116

35%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

166
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

94

26%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

43

25%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

51

27%

LEVEL 3

65

35%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

58

37%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

53

30%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

44

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

84

28%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

15

48%

LEVEL 2

13

42%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

21

49%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

57

18%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

113

37%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

35

69%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

37

67%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

127
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

166
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

116

33%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

9

69%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

10

71%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

76

37%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

29

13%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

88

40%

LEVEL 4

42

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

61

48%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

20

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

65

45%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

82

25%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

165
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

92

26%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.