ALTMAR-PARISH-WILLIAMSTOWN CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

193

40%

LEVEL 2

149

31%

LEVEL 3

111

23%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

183

39%

LEVEL 2

161

34%

LEVEL 3

91

19%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

79

31%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

84

33%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

114

49%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

99

46%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

181

39%

LEVEL 2

142

31%

LEVEL 3

109

24%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

172

39%

LEVEL 2

155

35%

LEVEL 3

84

19%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

118

30%

LEVEL 2

130

33%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

112

30%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

75

78%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

71

72%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

45

29%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

53

36%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

149

45%

LEVEL 2

103

31%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

143

45%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

123
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

177

39%

LEVEL 2

157

34%

LEVEL 3

91

20%

LEVEL 4

32

7%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

144
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

189

39%

LEVEL 2

146

30%

LEVEL 3

111

23%

LEVEL 4

33

7%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.