Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM B TECLER ARTS IN EDUCATION GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

106

49%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

125

50%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

44

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

45

44%

LEVEL 2

27

26%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

47

40%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

61

54%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

14

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

78

59%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

20

15%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

40

42%

LEVEL 2

28

29%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

37

37%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

57

57%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

77

62%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

78

45%

LEVEL 2

49

28%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

81

41%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

28

65%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

44

83%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

47
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

93

47%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

40

20%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

108

47%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

43

19%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

14

42%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

7

21%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

99

54%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

118

54%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

35

16%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

41
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

96

48%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

35

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

120

50%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.