Skip to Content
Main content

CLEVELAND HILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

78

31%

LEVEL 4

62

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

50

19%

LEVEL 2

92

35%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

56

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

25

21%

LEVEL 3

40

34%

LEVEL 4

39

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

42

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

23

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

4

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

14

58%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

42

35%

LEVEL 4

40

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

30

23%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

42

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

18

21%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

21

25%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

19

21%

LEVEL 2

39

44%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

8

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

76

35%

LEVEL 4

62

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

25

61%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

136
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

35

15%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

62

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

56

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

10

10%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

29

29%

LEVEL 4

39

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

27

28%

LEVEL 3

31

32%

LEVEL 4

31

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

49

33%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.