LAKELAND-COPPER BEECH MIDDLE SCH GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 737

LEVEL 1

129

18%

LEVEL 2

215

29%

LEVEL 3

208

28%

LEVEL 4

185

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

402
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 775

LEVEL 1

143

18%

LEVEL 2

230

30%

LEVEL 3

205

26%

LEVEL 4

197

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

223
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

115

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

239
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

103

27%

LEVEL 3

111

29%

LEVEL 4

128

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

170
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

91

24%

LEVEL 2

123

32%

LEVEL 3

100

26%

LEVEL 4

70

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

107

27%

LEVEL 2

127

32%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

36
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

15

33%

LEVEL 4

21

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

11

21%

LEVEL 4

29

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

275
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

69

14%

LEVEL 2

141

29%

LEVEL 3

147

30%

LEVEL 4

128

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

266
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

76

16%

LEVEL 2

136

28%

LEVEL 3

140

29%

LEVEL 4

126

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

15

35%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

10

23%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

13

24%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

41

28%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

24

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

386
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 641

LEVEL 1

66

10%

LEVEL 2

189

29%

LEVEL 3

202

32%

LEVEL 4

184

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

397
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

79

11%

LEVEL 2

216

31%

LEVEL 3

201

29%

LEVEL 4

196

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

63

66%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

64

77%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

402
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 770

LEVEL 1

139

18%

LEVEL 2

229

30%

LEVEL 3

205

27%

LEVEL 4

197

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

332
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

84

15%

LEVEL 2

156

27%

LEVEL 3

166

29%

LEVEL 4

166

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

340
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

96

16%

LEVEL 2

174

29%

LEVEL 3

169

28%

LEVEL 4

171

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

45

27%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

47

28%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

401
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 770

LEVEL 1

140

18%

LEVEL 2

229

30%

LEVEL 3

205

27%

LEVEL 4

196

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.