Skip to Content
Main content

BRONX PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

67

20%

LEVEL 2

136

41%

LEVEL 3

94

28%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

53

15%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

105

30%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

36

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

48

27%

LEVEL 2

74

41%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

38

21%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

63
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

70

42%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

84
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

87

32%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

23

41%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

17

28%

LEVEL 2

31

51%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

128
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

93

31%

LEVEL 4

35

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

160
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

19

54%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

17

49%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

6

18%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

122

41%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

117
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

12

41%

LEVEL 3

11

38%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.